Tentomushi
Tentomushi vs Jam
Jam and Tentomushi both use AI to turn a recording into a written bug report, and both let people outside your team report without an account. The real differences: Tentomushi needs no browser extension anywhere in the flow, works on mobile web with a simple upload, and adds translation and flat pricing instead of per-seat AI caps.
The short version
This isn't an "AI vs. no AI" comparison — Jam AI already writes titles and reproduction steps from a recording, and Jam's Recording Links let people outside your team report without an account, similar to Tentomushi's AI Report Link. Jam is the stronger pick if you want a mature Chrome-extension workflow with built-in AI debugging and pull-request description generation. Tentomushi's advantage is that nothing needs installing anywhere in the flow — no Chrome extension for your team, no app for outside reporters. Recording captures a browser tab, a specific desktop app, or the full screen without a plugin, and on mobile web a reporter just uploads a screenshot or video that AI turns into a report automatically. Add automatic translation and flat per-plan pricing instead of per-seat AI caps, and that's what makes Tentomushi the better fit for a distributed team or a public-facing report link.
Feature by feature
| Feature | Tentomushi | Jam |
|---|---|---|
| Screen recording (browser tab, window, or full desktop) | Yes | Yes — tab or full desktop/monitor recording |
| Console context capture | Only if the console panel is already open when recording | Yes — auto-captured across multiple tabs |
| AI writes report content (title, repro steps) from the recording | Yes | Yes (Jam AI) |
| AI debugging: suggests a fix, drafts a PR description | Not currently | Yes (AI Debugger, JamGPT) |
| No-login link for people outside your team | Yes (AI Report Link) | Yes (Recording Links) |
| Confirmed mobile-web capture (photo/video upload) | Yes | Not confirmed — docs scope external links to desktop browsers |
| Automatic report translation | Yes | No known equivalent |
| Direct push to Jira, ClickUp, Linear, Monday.com | Yes | Yes (via integrations) |
| AI usage limits | Report-count based per plan | 5 free trial uses, then 200/person/month on Team |
| Entry pricing | €9/mo flat (Blue) | Free tier (5-min limit), then $16/user/mo |
Where Tentomushi goes further
Jam has real AI too — so what's actually different?
To be fair to Jam: Jam AI already generates a title and reproduction steps from a recording, and JamGPT can suggest a fix or draft a PR description. Tentomushi's AI does the title, description, and repro steps too — see AI Analysis & Translation — but adds translation and works from a phone, which Jam's AI features don't currently cover. (Automatic severity tagging is on Tentomushi's roadmap, not yet shipped.)
Works from a phone, not just a desktop browser
Jam's Recording Links (their no-account external-reporting feature) are documented as supporting desktop browsers — Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari. Tentomushi's AI Report Link embeds in your product and also works on mobile web, where there's no live recording — the user just uploads a screenshot or video instead, and AI analyzes it directly, no app to install.
Distributed teams don't lose detail to language
We didn't find a translation feature in Jam's AI toolset (auto-title, repro steps, debugging, PR descriptions). If your reporters and your dev team don't share a first language, Tentomushi's AI can translate the generated report automatically — see our guide on managing bug reports across time zones and languages.
Where Jam pulls ahead
Jam's AI Debugger and JamGPT go further than Tentomushi does today — suggesting a fix and drafting a pull-request description, not just writing the report. If that developer-facing debugging workflow matters more to you than an install-free, capture-anywhere flow — no Chrome extension, recording outside the browser, mobile-web upload, and automatic translation — Jam is worth a serious look.
Pricing side by side
Jam: free tier with a 5-minute recording limit and 5 trial uses of Jam AI, then $16 per user per month on the Team plan, which includes 200 AI generations per person per month — cost scales with headcount, and AI usage is capped per seat.
Tentomushi: Blue at €9/month for a solo developer (up to 100 reports, 15 AI analyses, 15 AI translations), Blue Team at €49/month for up to 6 users, Green Team at €149/month for up to 20 users — flat per-plan pricing, not per-seat. All non-custom plans include a 30-day partial refund guarantee — you only pay for the reports and AI usage you actually consume.
Jam's pricing was current as of this page's last update — always confirm current pricing on jam.dev before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is Tentomushi a Jam alternative?
Yes, though both already use AI to write a report from a recording, so it's not a matter of one having AI and the other not. Tentomushi differentiates on being install-free end to end — no Chrome extension for your team, no app for outside reporters — plus mobile-web capture, translation, and flat pricing rather than per-seat AI usage limits.
Does Jam have AI-generated bug reports?
Yes. Jam AI generates a title and reproduction steps from a recording automatically, and JamGPT can suggest a fix or draft a pull-request description. Tentomushi's AI writes a title, description, and reproduction steps from the recording too, and adds automatic translation — something we didn't find in Jam's AI toolset. (Automatic severity tagging is on Tentomushi's roadmap, not yet shipped.)
How does Tentomushi's pricing compare to Jam?
Jam's Team plan is $16 per user per month and includes 200 AI generations per person per month (5 free trial uses on the free tier). Tentomushi's Blue plan is €9 per month total for a solo developer, and Blue Team is €49 per month for up to 6 users — a flat plan price rather than a per-seat charge, with report-count limits instead of a separate AI-usage cap.
Does Jam also let clients report without an account?
Yes — Jam's Recording Links let anyone with the link record and submit with no account and no browser extension, documented as working on desktop versions of Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari. Tentomushi's AI Report Link works on desktop too — record your screen or upload a screenshot/video — and on mobile web, where there's no live recording, the user uploads a screenshot or video instead, which AI analyzes directly. Tentomushi's flow identifies the reporter by email, lets them review and submit the AI-written report, then redirects them back to your app.
Information about competitor tools on this page is compiled from publicly available sources — their websites, documentation, and pricing pages — as of this page's last update. These tools evolve continuously, so some details may have changed since; always confirm current features and pricing directly with the vendor before deciding.
See the AI-written report for yourself
Record a bug — or upload a photo/video from your phone — and let Tentomushi write and translate the report, at a flat monthly price.
Get Started →